Yokohama vs BFGoodrich - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-1
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability.
Company Snapshot
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsYokohama85
91BFGoodrich
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsYokohama87
84BFGoodrich
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsYokohama88
87BFGoodrich
Comfort
Yokohama winsYokohama85
79BFGoodrich
Noise Level
Yokohama winsYokohama83
76BFGoodrich
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsYokohama86
80BFGoodrich
Value for Money
Yokohama winsYokohama88
86BFGoodrich
Pros & Cons
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)