Michelin vs BFGoodrich - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-1
Quick Verdict
Michelin wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Michelin excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, BFGoodrich is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Michelin
Est. 1889
Headquarters
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Global Rank
#2
Employees
132,000+
Price Range
Premium
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Michelin winsMichelin95
91BFGoodrich
Wet Grip
Michelin winsMichelin94
84BFGoodrich
Dry Grip
Michelin winsMichelin92
87BFGoodrich
Comfort
Michelin winsMichelin90
79BFGoodrich
Noise Level
Michelin winsMichelin88
76BFGoodrich
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin winsMichelin91
80BFGoodrich
Value for Money
BFGoodrich winsMichelin78
86BFGoodrich
Pros & Cons
Michelin
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance
- Industry-leading durability and tread life
- Low rolling resistance for fuel efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet ride
- Strong brand reputation and warranty
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited budget options
- Some models can be firm on rough roads
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Michelin if...
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize long distance travel
- You prioritize wet conditions
- You prioritize premium vehicles
- You prioritize safety-conscious drivers
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)