Continental vs BFGoodrich - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
5-2
Quick Verdict
Continental wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Continental excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability and value for money.
Company Snapshot
Continental
Est. 1871
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Global Rank
#4
Employees
200,000+
Price Range
Premium
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsContinental90
91BFGoodrich
Wet Grip
Continental winsContinental95
84BFGoodrich
Dry Grip
Continental winsContinental91
87BFGoodrich
Comfort
Continental winsContinental89
79BFGoodrich
Noise Level
Continental winsContinental87
76BFGoodrich
Fuel Efficiency
Continental winsContinental90
80BFGoodrich
Value for Money
BFGoodrich winsContinental82
86BFGoodrich
Pros & Cons
Continental
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip
- Excellent braking performance
- German engineering quality
- Great for European car OEM replacement
- Good fuel efficiency ratings
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited truck/SUV options
- May wear faster than some competitors
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Continental if...
- You prioritize european vehicles
- You prioritize wet climate regions
- You prioritize safety-focused buyers
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize luxury sedans
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)