Michelin vs Continental - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
5-2
Quick Verdict
Michelin wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Michelin excels in durability, dry grip, comfort. However, Continental is better for wet grip and value for money.
Company Snapshot
Michelin
Est. 1889
Headquarters
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Global Rank
#2
Employees
132,000+
Price Range
Premium
Continental
Est. 1871
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Global Rank
#4
Employees
200,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Michelin winsMichelin95
90Continental
Wet Grip
Continental winsMichelin94
95Continental
Dry Grip
Michelin winsMichelin92
91Continental
Comfort
Michelin winsMichelin90
89Continental
Noise Level
Michelin winsMichelin88
87Continental
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin winsMichelin91
90Continental
Value for Money
Continental winsMichelin78
82Continental
Pros & Cons
Michelin
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance
- Industry-leading durability and tread life
- Low rolling resistance for fuel efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet ride
- Strong brand reputation and warranty
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited budget options
- Some models can be firm on rough roads
Continental
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip
- Excellent braking performance
- German engineering quality
- Great for European car OEM replacement
- Good fuel efficiency ratings
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited truck/SUV options
- May wear faster than some competitors
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Michelin if...
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize long distance travel
- You prioritize wet conditions
- You prioritize premium vehicles
- You prioritize safety-conscious drivers
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)
Choose Continental if...
- You prioritize european vehicles
- You prioritize wet climate regions
- You prioritize safety-focused buyers
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize luxury sedans
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)