Hankook vs BFGoodrich - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
5-2
Quick Verdict
Hankook wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Hankook excels in wet grip, comfort, noise level. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability and dry grip.
Company Snapshot
Hankook
Est. 1941
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#7
Employees
22,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsHankook86
91BFGoodrich
Wet Grip
Hankook winsHankook85
84BFGoodrich
Dry Grip
BFGoodrich winsHankook86
87BFGoodrich
Comfort
Hankook winsHankook84
79BFGoodrich
Noise Level
Hankook winsHankook82
76BFGoodrich
Fuel Efficiency
Hankook winsHankook87
80BFGoodrich
Value for Money
Hankook winsHankook92
86BFGoodrich
Pros & Cons
Hankook
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good overall performance
- OEM supplier to major automakers
- Improving brand reputation
- Wide availability
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception still improving
- Some premium features lacking
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Hankook if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)