Michelin vs Hankook - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-1
Quick Verdict
Michelin wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Michelin excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Hankook is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Michelin
Est. 1889
Headquarters
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Global Rank
#2
Employees
132,000+
Price Range
Premium
Hankook
Est. 1941
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#7
Employees
22,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Michelin winsMichelin95
86Hankook
Wet Grip
Michelin winsMichelin94
85Hankook
Dry Grip
Michelin winsMichelin92
86Hankook
Comfort
Michelin winsMichelin90
84Hankook
Noise Level
Michelin winsMichelin88
82Hankook
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin winsMichelin91
87Hankook
Value for Money
Hankook winsMichelin78
92Hankook
Pros & Cons
Michelin
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance
- Industry-leading durability and tread life
- Low rolling resistance for fuel efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet ride
- Strong brand reputation and warranty
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited budget options
- Some models can be firm on rough roads
Hankook
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good overall performance
- OEM supplier to major automakers
- Improving brand reputation
- Wide availability
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception still improving
- Some premium features lacking
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Michelin if...
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize long distance travel
- You prioritize wet conditions
- You prioritize premium vehicles
- You prioritize safety-conscious drivers
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)
Choose Hankook if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)