CEAT vs Yokohama - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
2-5
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, CEAT is better for durability and value for money.
Company Snapshot
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
CEAT winsCEAT86
85Yokohama
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsCEAT84
87Yokohama
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsCEAT83
88Yokohama
Comfort
Yokohama winsCEAT83
85Yokohama
Noise Level
Yokohama winsCEAT81
83Yokohama
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsCEAT85
86Yokohama
Value for Money
CEAT winsCEAT90
88Yokohama
Pros & Cons
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Which Should You Choose?
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)