CEAT vs Michelin - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Michelin wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Michelin excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, CEAT is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Michelin
Est. 1889
Headquarters
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Global Rank
#2
Employees
132,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Michelin winsCEAT86
95Michelin
Wet Grip
Michelin winsCEAT84
94Michelin
Dry Grip
Michelin winsCEAT83
92Michelin
Comfort
Michelin winsCEAT83
90Michelin
Noise Level
Michelin winsCEAT81
88Michelin
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin winsCEAT85
91Michelin
Value for Money
CEAT winsCEAT90
78Michelin
Pros & Cons
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Michelin
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance
- Industry-leading durability and tread life
- Low rolling resistance for fuel efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet ride
- Strong brand reputation and warranty
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited budget options
- Some models can be firm on rough roads
Which Should You Choose?
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Michelin if...
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize long distance travel
- You prioritize wet conditions
- You prioritize premium vehicles
- You prioritize safety-conscious drivers
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)