CEAT vs Continental - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Continental wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Continental excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, CEAT is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Continental
Est. 1871
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Global Rank
#4
Employees
200,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Continental winsCEAT86
90Continental
Wet Grip
Continental winsCEAT84
95Continental
Dry Grip
Continental winsCEAT83
91Continental
Comfort
Continental winsCEAT83
89Continental
Noise Level
Continental winsCEAT81
87Continental
Fuel Efficiency
Continental winsCEAT85
90Continental
Value for Money
CEAT winsCEAT90
82Continental
Pros & Cons
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Continental
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip
- Excellent braking performance
- German engineering quality
- Great for European car OEM replacement
- Good fuel efficiency ratings
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited truck/SUV options
- May wear faster than some competitors
Which Should You Choose?
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Continental if...
- You prioritize european vehicles
- You prioritize wet climate regions
- You prioritize safety-focused buyers
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize luxury sedans
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)