CEAT vs BFGoodrich - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
4-2
Quick Verdict
CEAT wins this comparison with better scores in 4 out of 7 categories. CEAT excels in comfort, noise level, fuel efficiency. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability and dry grip.
Company Snapshot
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsCEAT86
91BFGoodrich
Wet Grip
CEAT84
84BFGoodrich
Dry Grip
BFGoodrich winsCEAT83
87BFGoodrich
Comfort
CEAT winsCEAT83
79BFGoodrich
Noise Level
CEAT winsCEAT81
76BFGoodrich
Fuel Efficiency
CEAT winsCEAT85
80BFGoodrich
Value for Money
CEAT winsCEAT90
86BFGoodrich
Pros & Cons
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Which Should You Choose?
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)