Yokohama vs Hankook - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
4-3
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 4 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, Hankook is better for durability and fuel efficiency.
Company Snapshot
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Hankook
Est. 1941
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#7
Employees
22,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Hankook winsYokohama85
86Hankook
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsYokohama87
85Hankook
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsYokohama88
86Hankook
Comfort
Yokohama winsYokohama85
84Hankook
Noise Level
Yokohama winsYokohama83
82Hankook
Fuel Efficiency
Hankook winsYokohama86
87Hankook
Value for Money
Hankook winsYokohama88
92Hankook
Pros & Cons
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Hankook
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good overall performance
- OEM supplier to major automakers
- Improving brand reputation
- Wide availability
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception still improving
- Some premium features lacking
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Hankook if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)