Yokohama vs Continental - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Continental wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Continental excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Yokohama is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Continental
Est. 1871
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Global Rank
#4
Employees
200,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Continental winsYokohama85
90Continental
Wet Grip
Continental winsYokohama87
95Continental
Dry Grip
Continental winsYokohama88
91Continental
Comfort
Continental winsYokohama85
89Continental
Noise Level
Continental winsYokohama83
87Continental
Fuel Efficiency
Continental winsYokohama86
90Continental
Value for Money
Yokohama winsYokohama88
82Continental
Pros & Cons
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Continental
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip
- Excellent braking performance
- German engineering quality
- Great for European car OEM replacement
- Good fuel efficiency ratings
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited truck/SUV options
- May wear faster than some competitors
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Continental if...
- You prioritize european vehicles
- You prioritize wet climate regions
- You prioritize safety-focused buyers
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize luxury sedans
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)