Yokohama vs Bridgestone - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Bridgestone wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Bridgestone excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Yokohama is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Bridgestone
Est. 1931
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#1
Employees
130,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Bridgestone winsYokohama85
92Bridgestone
Wet Grip
Bridgestone winsYokohama87
90Bridgestone
Dry Grip
Bridgestone winsYokohama88
93Bridgestone
Comfort
Bridgestone winsYokohama85
88Bridgestone
Noise Level
Bridgestone winsYokohama83
85Bridgestone
Fuel Efficiency
Bridgestone winsYokohama86
88Bridgestone
Value for Money
Yokohama winsYokohama88
80Bridgestone
Pros & Cons
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Bridgestone
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and handling
- Wide range of products for all vehicles
- Strong OEM partnerships ensure quality
- Good balance of performance and comfort
- Reliable brand with global presence
Cons
- Can be slightly noisier than competitors
- Premium pricing for top models
- Some touring models wear faster
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Bridgestone if...
- You prioritize performance driving
- You prioritize suvs and trucks
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize highway cruising
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)