MRF vs Yokohama - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
2-5
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, MRF is better for durability and value for money.
Company Snapshot
MRF
Est. 1946
Headquarters
Chennai, India
Global Rank
#14
Employees
20,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
MRF winsMRF92
85Yokohama
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsMRF85
87Yokohama
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsMRF86
88Yokohama
Comfort
Yokohama winsMRF84
85Yokohama
Noise Level
Yokohama winsMRF80
83Yokohama
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsMRF82
86Yokohama
Value for Money
MRF winsMRF91
88Yokohama
Pros & Cons
MRF
Pros
- Exceptional durability for rough roads
- India's most trusted tyre brand
- Excellent monsoon performance
- Strong dealer network across India
- Good value for money
- Motorsport heritage (F3, MotoGP)
Cons
- Limited international presence
- Less refined at high speeds
- Not designed for cold climates
- Brand less known outside India
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Which Should You Choose?
Choose MRF if...
- You prioritize indian road conditions
- You prioritize hot climate driving
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize long-distance travel in india
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)