MRF vs Continental - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
2-5
Quick Verdict
Continental wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Continental excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, MRF is better for durability and value for money.
Company Snapshot
MRF
Est. 1946
Headquarters
Chennai, India
Global Rank
#14
Employees
20,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Continental
Est. 1871
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Global Rank
#4
Employees
200,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
MRF winsMRF92
90Continental
Wet Grip
Continental winsMRF85
95Continental
Dry Grip
Continental winsMRF86
91Continental
Comfort
Continental winsMRF84
89Continental
Noise Level
Continental winsMRF80
87Continental
Fuel Efficiency
Continental winsMRF82
90Continental
Value for Money
MRF winsMRF91
82Continental
Pros & Cons
MRF
Pros
- Exceptional durability for rough roads
- India's most trusted tyre brand
- Excellent monsoon performance
- Strong dealer network across India
- Good value for money
- Motorsport heritage (F3, MotoGP)
Cons
- Limited international presence
- Less refined at high speeds
- Not designed for cold climates
- Brand less known outside India
Continental
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip
- Excellent braking performance
- German engineering quality
- Great for European car OEM replacement
- Good fuel efficiency ratings
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited truck/SUV options
- May wear faster than some competitors
Which Should You Choose?
Choose MRF if...
- You prioritize indian road conditions
- You prioritize hot climate driving
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize long-distance travel in india
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Continental if...
- You prioritize european vehicles
- You prioritize wet climate regions
- You prioritize safety-focused buyers
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize luxury sedans
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)