Kumho vs Yokohama - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Kumho is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Yokohama winsKumho82
85Yokohama
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsKumho83
87Yokohama
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsKumho82
88Yokohama
Comfort
Yokohama winsKumho81
85Yokohama
Noise Level
Yokohama winsKumho79
83Yokohama
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsKumho84
86Yokohama
Value for Money
Kumho winsKumho93
88Yokohama
Pros & Cons
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)