Kumho vs Bridgestone - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Bridgestone wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Bridgestone excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Kumho is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
Bridgestone
Est. 1931
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#1
Employees
130,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Bridgestone winsKumho82
92Bridgestone
Wet Grip
Bridgestone winsKumho83
90Bridgestone
Dry Grip
Bridgestone winsKumho82
93Bridgestone
Comfort
Bridgestone winsKumho81
88Bridgestone
Noise Level
Bridgestone winsKumho79
85Bridgestone
Fuel Efficiency
Bridgestone winsKumho84
88Bridgestone
Value for Money
Kumho winsKumho93
80Bridgestone
Pros & Cons
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
Bridgestone
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and handling
- Wide range of products for all vehicles
- Strong OEM partnerships ensure quality
- Good balance of performance and comfort
- Reliable brand with global presence
Cons
- Can be slightly noisier than competitors
- Premium pricing for top models
- Some touring models wear faster
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)
Choose Bridgestone if...
- You prioritize performance driving
- You prioritize suvs and trucks
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize highway cruising
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)