Kumho vs BFGoodrich - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
4-3
Quick Verdict
Kumho wins this comparison with better scores in 4 out of 7 categories. Kumho excels in comfort, noise level, fuel efficiency. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability and wet grip.
Company Snapshot
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsKumho82
91BFGoodrich
Wet Grip
BFGoodrich winsKumho83
84BFGoodrich
Dry Grip
BFGoodrich winsKumho82
87BFGoodrich
Comfort
Kumho winsKumho81
79BFGoodrich
Noise Level
Kumho winsKumho79
76BFGoodrich
Fuel Efficiency
Kumho winsKumho84
80BFGoodrich
Value for Money
Kumho winsKumho93
86BFGoodrich
Pros & Cons
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)