Hankook vs Yokohama - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
3-4
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 4 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, Hankook is better for durability and fuel efficiency.
Company Snapshot
Hankook
Est. 1941
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#7
Employees
22,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Hankook winsHankook86
85Yokohama
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsHankook85
87Yokohama
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsHankook86
88Yokohama
Comfort
Yokohama winsHankook84
85Yokohama
Noise Level
Yokohama winsHankook82
83Yokohama
Fuel Efficiency
Hankook winsHankook87
86Yokohama
Value for Money
Hankook winsHankook92
88Yokohama
Pros & Cons
Hankook
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good overall performance
- OEM supplier to major automakers
- Improving brand reputation
- Wide availability
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception still improving
- Some premium features lacking
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Hankook if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)