Hankook vs Michelin - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Michelin wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Michelin excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Hankook is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Hankook
Est. 1941
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#7
Employees
22,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Michelin
Est. 1889
Headquarters
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Global Rank
#2
Employees
132,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Michelin winsHankook86
95Michelin
Wet Grip
Michelin winsHankook85
94Michelin
Dry Grip
Michelin winsHankook86
92Michelin
Comfort
Michelin winsHankook84
90Michelin
Noise Level
Michelin winsHankook82
88Michelin
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin winsHankook87
91Michelin
Value for Money
Hankook winsHankook92
78Michelin
Pros & Cons
Hankook
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good overall performance
- OEM supplier to major automakers
- Improving brand reputation
- Wide availability
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception still improving
- Some premium features lacking
Michelin
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance
- Industry-leading durability and tread life
- Low rolling resistance for fuel efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet ride
- Strong brand reputation and warranty
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited budget options
- Some models can be firm on rough roads
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Hankook if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Michelin if...
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize long distance travel
- You prioritize wet conditions
- You prioritize premium vehicles
- You prioritize safety-conscious drivers
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)