Falken vs BFGoodrich - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-1
Quick Verdict
Falken wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Falken excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability.
Company Snapshot
Falken
Est. 1983
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#9
Employees
Part of Sumitomo (39,000+ total)
Price Range
Mid-Range
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsFalken84
91BFGoodrich
Wet Grip
Falken winsFalken86
84BFGoodrich
Dry Grip
Falken winsFalken88
87BFGoodrich
Comfort
Falken winsFalken83
79BFGoodrich
Noise Level
Falken winsFalken81
76BFGoodrich
Fuel Efficiency
Falken winsFalken83
80BFGoodrich
Value for Money
Falken winsFalken90
86BFGoodrich
Pros & Cons
Falken
Pros
- Great performance for the price
- Strong motorsport heritage
- Good wet and dry grip
- Popular with enthusiasts
- Excellent all-season options
Cons
- Not as refined as premium brands
- Brand perception still growing
- Noise levels can be higher
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Falken if...
- You prioritize performance value seekers
- You prioritize sports car owners
- You prioritize all-season performance
- You prioritize enthusiast drivers
- You prioritize drifting community
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)