Continental vs CEAT - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-1
Quick Verdict
Continental wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Continental excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, CEAT is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Continental
Est. 1871
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Global Rank
#4
Employees
200,000+
Price Range
Premium
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Continental winsContinental90
86CEAT
Wet Grip
Continental winsContinental95
84CEAT
Dry Grip
Continental winsContinental91
83CEAT
Comfort
Continental winsContinental89
83CEAT
Noise Level
Continental winsContinental87
81CEAT
Fuel Efficiency
Continental winsContinental90
85CEAT
Value for Money
CEAT winsContinental82
90CEAT
Pros & Cons
Continental
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip
- Excellent braking performance
- German engineering quality
- Great for European car OEM replacement
- Good fuel efficiency ratings
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited truck/SUV options
- May wear faster than some competitors
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Continental if...
- You prioritize european vehicles
- You prioritize wet climate regions
- You prioritize safety-focused buyers
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize luxury sedans
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)