CEAT vs Kumho - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-1
Quick Verdict
CEAT wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. CEAT excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Kumho is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
Detailed Comparison
Durability
CEAT winsCEAT86
82Kumho
Wet Grip
CEAT winsCEAT84
83Kumho
Dry Grip
CEAT winsCEAT83
82Kumho
Comfort
CEAT winsCEAT83
81Kumho
Noise Level
CEAT winsCEAT81
79Kumho
Fuel Efficiency
CEAT winsCEAT85
84Kumho
Value for Money
Kumho winsCEAT90
93Kumho
Pros & Cons
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
Which Should You Choose?
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)