BFGoodrich vs Yokohama - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability.
Company Snapshot
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsBFGoodrich91
85Yokohama
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsBFGoodrich84
87Yokohama
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsBFGoodrich87
88Yokohama
Comfort
Yokohama winsBFGoodrich79
85Yokohama
Noise Level
Yokohama winsBFGoodrich76
83Yokohama
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsBFGoodrich80
86Yokohama
Value for Money
Yokohama winsBFGoodrich86
88Yokohama
Pros & Cons
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Which Should You Choose?
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)