BFGoodrich vs Kumho - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
3-4
Quick Verdict
Kumho wins this comparison with better scores in 4 out of 7 categories. Kumho excels in comfort, noise level, fuel efficiency. However, BFGoodrich is better for durability and wet grip.
Company Snapshot
BFGoodrich
Est. 1870
Headquarters
Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Global Rank
#6
Employees
Part of Michelin
Price Range
Mid-Range
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
Detailed Comparison
Durability
BFGoodrich winsBFGoodrich91
82Kumho
Wet Grip
BFGoodrich winsBFGoodrich84
83Kumho
Dry Grip
BFGoodrich winsBFGoodrich87
82Kumho
Comfort
Kumho winsBFGoodrich79
81Kumho
Noise Level
Kumho winsBFGoodrich76
79Kumho
Fuel Efficiency
Kumho winsBFGoodrich80
84Kumho
Value for Money
Kumho winsBFGoodrich86
93Kumho
Pros & Cons
BFGoodrich
Pros
- Legendary off-road performance
- Exceptional durability
- Michelin quality backing
- Baja racing pedigree
- Strong sidewall construction
Cons
- Can be noisy on highway
- Higher rolling resistance
- Premium pricing for off-road segment
- Limited sedan options
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
Which Should You Choose?
Choose BFGoodrich if...
- You prioritize off-road enthusiasts
- You prioritize overlanding
- You prioritize trucks and suvs
- You prioritize rugged durability
- You prioritize desert racing
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)