Yokohama vs MRF - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
5-2
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, MRF is better for durability and value for money.
Company Snapshot
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
MRF
Est. 1946
Headquarters
Chennai, India
Global Rank
#14
Employees
20,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
MRF winsYokohama85
92MRF
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsYokohama87
85MRF
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsYokohama88
86MRF
Comfort
Yokohama winsYokohama85
84MRF
Noise Level
Yokohama winsYokohama83
80MRF
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsYokohama86
82MRF
Value for Money
MRF winsYokohama88
91MRF
Pros & Cons
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
MRF
Pros
- Exceptional durability for rough roads
- India's most trusted tyre brand
- Excellent monsoon performance
- Strong dealer network across India
- Good value for money
- Motorsport heritage (F3, MotoGP)
Cons
- Limited international presence
- Less refined at high speeds
- Not designed for cold climates
- Brand less known outside India
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose MRF if...
- You prioritize indian road conditions
- You prioritize hot climate driving
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize long-distance travel in india
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)