Yokohama vs Falken - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
5-1
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in durability, wet grip, comfort. However, Falken is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Falken
Est. 1983
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#9
Employees
Part of Sumitomo (39,000+ total)
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Yokohama winsYokohama85
84Falken
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsYokohama87
86Falken
Dry Grip
Yokohama88
88Falken
Comfort
Yokohama winsYokohama85
83Falken
Noise Level
Yokohama winsYokohama83
81Falken
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsYokohama86
83Falken
Value for Money
Falken winsYokohama88
90Falken
Pros & Cons
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Falken
Pros
- Great performance for the price
- Strong motorsport heritage
- Good wet and dry grip
- Popular with enthusiasts
- Excellent all-season options
Cons
- Not as refined as premium brands
- Brand perception still growing
- Noise levels can be higher
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Falken if...
- You prioritize performance value seekers
- You prioritize sports car owners
- You prioritize all-season performance
- You prioritize enthusiast drivers
- You prioritize drifting community
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)