Kumho vs Firestone - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
5-1
Quick Verdict
Kumho wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Kumho excels in wet grip, comfort, noise level. However, Firestone is better for durability.
Company Snapshot
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
Firestone
Est. 1900
Headquarters
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Global Rank
#11
Employees
Part of Bridgestone
Price Range
Budget
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Firestone winsKumho82
83Firestone
Wet Grip
Kumho winsKumho83
81Firestone
Dry Grip
Kumho82
82Firestone
Comfort
Kumho winsKumho81
80Firestone
Noise Level
Kumho winsKumho79
78Firestone
Fuel Efficiency
Kumho winsKumho84
81Firestone
Value for Money
Kumho winsKumho93
91Firestone
Pros & Cons
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
Firestone
Pros
- Very affordable pricing
- Excellent dealer network
- Bridgestone quality backing
- Good warranty coverage
- Wide size availability
Cons
- Basic performance levels
- Shorter tread life than premium
- Limited performance options
- Can be noisy
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)
Choose Firestone if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize everyday driving
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
- You prioritize american brand preference
- You prioritize wide availability needs
Price Range: $ (Budget)