Hankook vs CEAT - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-0
Quick Verdict
Hankook wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Hankook excels in wet grip, dry grip, comfort. However, CEAT is better for .
Company Snapshot
Hankook
Est. 1941
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#7
Employees
22,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Hankook86
86CEAT
Wet Grip
Hankook winsHankook85
84CEAT
Dry Grip
Hankook winsHankook86
83CEAT
Comfort
Hankook winsHankook84
83CEAT
Noise Level
Hankook winsHankook82
81CEAT
Fuel Efficiency
Hankook winsHankook87
85CEAT
Value for Money
Hankook winsHankook92
90CEAT
Pros & Cons
Hankook
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good overall performance
- OEM supplier to major automakers
- Improving brand reputation
- Wide availability
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception still improving
- Some premium features lacking
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Hankook if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize all-season use
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)