Firestone vs Yokohama - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Yokohama wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Yokohama excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Firestone is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Firestone
Est. 1900
Headquarters
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Global Rank
#11
Employees
Part of Bridgestone
Price Range
Budget
Yokohama
Est. 1917
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#8
Employees
28,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Yokohama winsFirestone83
85Yokohama
Wet Grip
Yokohama winsFirestone81
87Yokohama
Dry Grip
Yokohama winsFirestone82
88Yokohama
Comfort
Yokohama winsFirestone80
85Yokohama
Noise Level
Yokohama winsFirestone78
83Yokohama
Fuel Efficiency
Yokohama winsFirestone81
86Yokohama
Value for Money
Firestone winsFirestone91
88Yokohama
Pros & Cons
Firestone
Pros
- Very affordable pricing
- Excellent dealer network
- Bridgestone quality backing
- Good warranty coverage
- Wide size availability
Cons
- Basic performance levels
- Shorter tread life than premium
- Limited performance options
- Can be noisy
Yokohama
Pros
- Excellent value for performance
- Good all-around performance
- Eco-friendly manufacturing
- Solid warranty coverage
- Wide product range
Cons
- Not class-leading in premium segment
- Limited availability in some regions
- Brand perception vs European brands
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Firestone if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize everyday driving
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
- You prioritize american brand preference
- You prioritize wide availability needs
Price Range: $ (Budget)
Choose Yokohama if...
- You prioritize value-conscious buyers
- You prioritize sports sedans
- You prioritize all-season needs
- You prioritize eco-friendly priority
- You prioritize japanese vehicles
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)