Falken vs Michelin - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
Michelin wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Michelin excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Falken is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Falken
Est. 1983
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#9
Employees
Part of Sumitomo (39,000+ total)
Price Range
Mid-Range
Michelin
Est. 1889
Headquarters
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Global Rank
#2
Employees
132,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Michelin winsFalken84
95Michelin
Wet Grip
Michelin winsFalken86
94Michelin
Dry Grip
Michelin winsFalken88
92Michelin
Comfort
Michelin winsFalken83
90Michelin
Noise Level
Michelin winsFalken81
88Michelin
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin winsFalken83
91Michelin
Value for Money
Falken winsFalken90
78Michelin
Pros & Cons
Falken
Pros
- Great performance for the price
- Strong motorsport heritage
- Good wet and dry grip
- Popular with enthusiasts
- Excellent all-season options
Cons
- Not as refined as premium brands
- Brand perception still growing
- Noise levels can be higher
Michelin
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance
- Industry-leading durability and tread life
- Low rolling resistance for fuel efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet ride
- Strong brand reputation and warranty
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited budget options
- Some models can be firm on rough roads
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Falken if...
- You prioritize performance value seekers
- You prioritize sports car owners
- You prioritize all-season performance
- You prioritize enthusiast drivers
- You prioritize drifting community
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Michelin if...
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize long distance travel
- You prioritize wet conditions
- You prioritize premium vehicles
- You prioritize safety-conscious drivers
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)