Falken vs Firestone - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
6-1
Quick Verdict
Falken wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. Falken excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Firestone is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Falken
Est. 1983
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Global Rank
#9
Employees
Part of Sumitomo (39,000+ total)
Price Range
Mid-Range
Firestone
Est. 1900
Headquarters
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Global Rank
#11
Employees
Part of Bridgestone
Price Range
Budget
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Falken winsFalken84
83Firestone
Wet Grip
Falken winsFalken86
81Firestone
Dry Grip
Falken winsFalken88
82Firestone
Comfort
Falken winsFalken83
80Firestone
Noise Level
Falken winsFalken81
78Firestone
Fuel Efficiency
Falken winsFalken83
81Firestone
Value for Money
Firestone winsFalken90
91Firestone
Pros & Cons
Falken
Pros
- Great performance for the price
- Strong motorsport heritage
- Good wet and dry grip
- Popular with enthusiasts
- Excellent all-season options
Cons
- Not as refined as premium brands
- Brand perception still growing
- Noise levels can be higher
Firestone
Pros
- Very affordable pricing
- Excellent dealer network
- Bridgestone quality backing
- Good warranty coverage
- Wide size availability
Cons
- Basic performance levels
- Shorter tread life than premium
- Limited performance options
- Can be noisy
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Falken if...
- You prioritize performance value seekers
- You prioritize sports car owners
- You prioritize all-season performance
- You prioritize enthusiast drivers
- You prioritize drifting community
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose Firestone if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious buyers
- You prioritize everyday driving
- You prioritize fleet vehicles
- You prioritize american brand preference
- You prioritize wide availability needs
Price Range: $ (Budget)