MRF vs CEAT - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
5-2
Quick Verdict
MRF wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. MRF excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, CEAT is better for noise level and fuel efficiency.
Company Snapshot
MRF
Est. 1946
Headquarters
Chennai, India
Global Rank
#14
Employees
20,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
MRF winsMRF92
86CEAT
Wet Grip
MRF winsMRF85
84CEAT
Dry Grip
MRF winsMRF86
83CEAT
Comfort
MRF winsMRF84
83CEAT
Noise Level
CEAT winsMRF80
81CEAT
Fuel Efficiency
CEAT winsMRF82
85CEAT
Value for Money
MRF winsMRF91
90CEAT
Pros & Cons
MRF
Pros
- Exceptional durability for rough roads
- India's most trusted tyre brand
- Excellent monsoon performance
- Strong dealer network across India
- Good value for money
- Motorsport heritage (F3, MotoGP)
Cons
- Limited international presence
- Less refined at high speeds
- Not designed for cold climates
- Brand less known outside India
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Which Should You Choose?
Choose MRF if...
- You prioritize indian road conditions
- You prioritize hot climate driving
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize long-distance travel in india
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)