Kumho vs MRF - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
2-5
Quick Verdict
MRF wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. MRF excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Kumho is better for fuel efficiency and value for money.
Company Snapshot
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
MRF
Est. 1946
Headquarters
Chennai, India
Global Rank
#14
Employees
20,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
MRF winsKumho82
92MRF
Wet Grip
MRF winsKumho83
85MRF
Dry Grip
MRF winsKumho82
86MRF
Comfort
MRF winsKumho81
84MRF
Noise Level
MRF winsKumho79
80MRF
Fuel Efficiency
Kumho winsKumho84
82MRF
Value for Money
Kumho winsKumho93
91MRF
Pros & Cons
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
MRF
Pros
- Exceptional durability for rough roads
- India's most trusted tyre brand
- Excellent monsoon performance
- Strong dealer network across India
- Good value for money
- Motorsport heritage (F3, MotoGP)
Cons
- Limited international presence
- Less refined at high speeds
- Not designed for cold climates
- Brand less known outside India
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)
Choose MRF if...
- You prioritize indian road conditions
- You prioritize hot climate driving
- You prioritize daily commuting
- You prioritize long-distance travel in india
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)