Kumho vs CEAT - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
1-6
Quick Verdict
CEAT wins this comparison with better scores in 6 out of 7 categories. CEAT excels in durability, wet grip, dry grip. However, Kumho is better for value for money.
Company Snapshot
Kumho
Est. 1960
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Global Rank
#13
Employees
10,000+
Price Range
Budget
CEAT
Est. 1958
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Global Rank
#18
Employees
8,000+
Price Range
Mid-Range
Detailed Comparison
Durability
CEAT winsKumho82
86CEAT
Wet Grip
CEAT winsKumho83
84CEAT
Dry Grip
CEAT winsKumho82
83CEAT
Comfort
CEAT winsKumho81
83CEAT
Noise Level
CEAT winsKumho79
81CEAT
Fuel Efficiency
CEAT winsKumho84
85CEAT
Value for Money
Kumho winsKumho93
90CEAT
Pros & Cons
Kumho
Pros
- Excellent price point
- OEM supplier to major brands
- Good fuel efficiency
- Improving quality
- Strong warranty
Cons
- Not class-leading performance
- Brand perception challenges
- Limited premium options
- Shorter tread life than some
CEAT
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Strong two-wheeler segment
- Good fuel efficiency
- Innovative technologies
- Wide availability in India
- Strong brand recall
Cons
- Limited premium range
- Less refined than global brands
- International presence limited
- Noise levels on some models
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Kumho if...
- You prioritize budget buyers
- You prioritize daily commuters
- You prioritize oem replacement
- You prioritize value priority
- You prioritize korean vehicle owners
Price Range: $ (Budget)
Choose CEAT if...
- You prioritize budget-conscious indian drivers
- You prioritize two-wheelers
- You prioritize small cars
- You prioritize city driving
- You prioritize monsoon conditions
Price Range: $$ (Mid-Range)