Continental vs Michelin - Tyre Comparison
VS
Score
2-5
Quick Verdict
Michelin wins this comparison with better scores in 5 out of 7 categories. Michelin excels in durability, dry grip, comfort. However, Continental is better for wet grip and value for money.
Company Snapshot
Continental
Est. 1871
Headquarters
Hanover, Germany
Global Rank
#4
Employees
200,000+
Price Range
Premium
Michelin
Est. 1889
Headquarters
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Global Rank
#2
Employees
132,000+
Price Range
Premium
Detailed Comparison
Durability
Michelin winsContinental90
95Michelin
Wet Grip
Continental winsContinental95
94Michelin
Dry Grip
Michelin winsContinental91
92Michelin
Comfort
Michelin winsContinental89
90Michelin
Noise Level
Michelin winsContinental87
88Michelin
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin winsContinental90
91Michelin
Value for Money
Continental winsContinental82
78Michelin
Pros & Cons
Continental
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip
- Excellent braking performance
- German engineering quality
- Great for European car OEM replacement
- Good fuel efficiency ratings
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited truck/SUV options
- May wear faster than some competitors
Michelin
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance
- Industry-leading durability and tread life
- Low rolling resistance for fuel efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet ride
- Strong brand reputation and warranty
Cons
- Premium pricing
- Limited budget options
- Some models can be firm on rough roads
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Continental if...
- You prioritize european vehicles
- You prioritize wet climate regions
- You prioritize safety-focused buyers
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize luxury sedans
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)
Choose Michelin if...
- You prioritize highway driving
- You prioritize long distance travel
- You prioritize wet conditions
- You prioritize premium vehicles
- You prioritize safety-conscious drivers
Price Range: $$$ (Premium)